Ramblings of a Scottish Student

I have just watched the Dispatches programme broadcast on Channel 4 yesterday.  I must say, I was getting a little fed up with Dispatches and felt it was moving in an undesirable direction over its content, but I found this programme of a reasonably good quality and addressed many of the key issues that I would have expected any balanced documentary to have done on this issue.

The programme was based on the way in which police deal with public order at large protests in the wake of the G20 disaster at the start of the year.  The senior Metropolitan Police officer who took part in the programme and described G20 as a policing success must be living in an ivory tower:  a man dies after officers act in a way which appears to be totally disproportionate, an officer facing potential criminal charges and widespread condemnation from the public, academics and the police watchdog cannot in anyway be viewed as a successful policing operation!

Returning to Dispatches, those interviewed who were not employed by the Metropolitan Police did speak a lot of sense.  Protests in this country have largely moved to peaceful ones and where violence does happen it appears that more often than not a major contributing factor is the police tactics.

The gear that police being deployed in public order situations is very much disproportionate.  I have no issues with police dressed like “Robocop” where it is needed for their safety, but deploying them in that kit from the start of the protest is a major fail.  I would imagine that having that kit on changes the way an officer thinks, it also changes the attitudes of those in attendance to one that is much less compliant than it may otherwise have been:  the police go ready for confrontation and appear to be seeking it out.

The focus of public order policing in the UK is very much, from what I’ve seen, more about policing civil unrest and public disorder than it is about actually keeping the peace in the first place.

The job of the police, in my opinion, at such events is two fold.  First and foremost it is about keeping those who attend the protest safe and secondly to ensure that people and property around the protest is also kept safe.

I liked the community policing style adopted at the Climate Camp in August – it seemed very appropriate.  You have a large number of people in an area for a number of days who are all gathered together for a common purpose:  they are essentially a community; so why not police them like a community.  Officers patrolling in normal, day-to-day police with officers on standby should trouble break out (just like they are when policing the “normal” communities”).  It’s not an overnight fix, and there will always be individuals who will cause trouble:  this is a problem with society generally and not just protests.

UK public order policing has been developed based on the riots that were common place in the 70s and 80s; modes of protest have changed and have largely become peaceful and as such the police must change their tactics in order to ensure that the police response is appropriate and moves with the times.  Yes, officers need to be trained to deal with the rare situations and need to be able to handle them, but does their training need to focus solely on the extreme to the detriment of covering the norm?  If the extreme is taught to the police as the norm; then officers on the ground are going to treat the norm as the extreme, after all they’ve been trained to deal with nothing else.

Frankly I found the comments of Comdr. Bob Broadhurst (Metropolitan Police) regarding the latest policing tactics in Northern Ireland dismissive and poor.  As was pointed out by others in the programme the level of violence seen in Belfast and Londonderry far outstrips what happens in the towns and cities of mainland Britain.  Yes, we have seen some violence on par with that of Northern Ireland, but PSNI have had to deal with a lot more incidents on that scale than the Met or any other force in the UK has had to deal with.  The tactics clearly worked when they were employed by the Met – Climate Camp in August went by peacefully when tactics from PSNI were used.

Tactics such as containment can only lead to one thing:  Violence.  It’s very basic human behaviour that is displayed in situations such as this.  When you have a large group of people in a small space, a space which is becoming smaller as the police advance forward and push the public back, then anger levels rise to points where it overflows and violence happens.

Sadly, there will always be a small number who break the rules and the police should deal with them appropriately, and by appropriately I also mean proportionately.  However, policing public order has to move away from having disorder at the forefront to a model which is more at home with the way protesting has been progressing.

Dispatches:  Ready for a riot was broadcast on Channel 4 on Monday 19 October 2009 at 20:00.  The programme is available on 4OD to be watched at anytime for 30 days following its original broadcast.  4OD can be found at http://www.channel4.com/4od

You may remember that I wrote about a series on BBC1 called Criminal Justice in the past.  The series followed a fictional character, Ben Coulter, through the criminal justice system accused of Murder.  He was convicted and as it turned out he was innocent.  Written by a barrister, it was one of the best reflections I have seen of the Criminal Justice system which exposed many of the flaws in the system.

Well, tonight Criminal Justice returns to our screens on BBC1 at 9pm.  Once again the series will follow a fictional character, Juliet Miller, on her journey through England’s Criminal Justice system.

I’ll be watching and I hope that it will be as gripping and revealing as the first series was.

Following on from Android and Michael’s search terms, here are some of mine for the last month.  Mine are not very funny, some are concerning and the vast majority of the search terms over the last month have been related to compassion within Scots Law and the release of the Lockerbie bomber:

“lord gill’s icl disaster” – I wonder what an ICL disaster is…  I’m assuming this relates to Lord Gill’s report into the ICL Stockline Plastics explosion in 2004, published earlier this year.

“i failed my law exams” – join the club…

“scots law exam” – there are many, which one are you wanting to know about?

“how should i pass my contract law exam?” – revising usually works, but given I’ve failed it twice if you discover the secret then please let me know

“paracetamol overdose” – Once again, this is very bad.  Do not attempt it, yes, put the paracetamol down.  Thank you.

“will a cold get me out of prison early?” – No, it won’t.  Not unless the cold has somehow mutated into a terminal illness.

“is killing the Queen treason?” – Do I really need to answer that one?  Yes, it is.

“what is a perverse verdict?” Well, let’s see…a verdict that is perverse maybe?

“scottish government plural” There is only one of them, thankfully.

“scottish criminal justice jury system” – all criminal trials tried on indictment have a jury of 15

“america annoyed with lockerbie bombers release” – they can be annoyed all they want, not their decision and I don’t really care.

“is it scottish law to let sick prisoners go?” – The terminally ill ones with three months or less to live yes, otherwise no.

“parole board rules for compassionate release” – They have none – the decision falls to the Cabinet Secretary for Justice.

“is torture fun?” – I wouldn’t image so…

My most read post of the last month has been my post on whether changes are needed to the rules and laws on compassionate release from prison